---
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/hypersensitive_covid_tests_sick_fruit_and_the_mendacious_dr_fauci.html#ixzz6hv5HKQE3
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Hypersensitive COVID tests, 'sick' fruit, and the mendacious Dr. Fauci
The Wuhan virus has been politicized around the world, but America has taken politicization to nuclear levels because the Democrats weaponized it against Trump. It's been in the establishment's interest to inflate Wuhan virus numbers by manipulating the RT-PCR test used to diagnose people with the virus. In Europe, they're figuring out the false positives problem, but that information is hidden in the U.S. A new video, however, explains what's going on — and the "sick" kiwis help prove it.
The current diagnostic test for the Wuhan virus is based upon the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique that Kary Banks Mullis, a biochemist, invented in 1983. The technique is so important that Mullis won a Nobel Prize in chemistry — and, unlike the Nobel Peace Prize, that is a prize with legitimate cachet.
Here, shorn of any scientific language at all, is what the PCR technique does: it takes a molecule and repeatedly "cycles" it, with each cycle making the molecule twice as large as before. The first cycle doubles the size (2 x 2); the second cycle creates makes it eight times as big as the original (2 x 2 x 2); the third cycle makes it sixteen times as big (2 x 2 x 2 x 2); and so on, to theoretically indefinite numbers of cycles.
The point of the test is that there will come a point at which you've enlarged the molecule enough that you can see what's inside it. Keep in mind, though, that the more you magnify a thing, the more you see things you wouldn't have noticed before. For example, the pictures below all show a drop of blood with the magnification increasing from an ordinary camera shot to a regular microscope to an electron microscope:
What's happening with the PCR test when it's used to diagnose the Wuhan virus (the RT-PCR test) is that there's no standard for the number of cycles being run to enlarge the molecule inspected. Some labs are doing as many as 30 cycles, which means they're blowing up the molecule as if it's in an electron microscope and finding all sorts of things, including minute and meaningless virus particles.
The rule of thumb is that if a virus can be seen at a small number of cycles, its presence is significant enough to mean that someone is sick and contagious. As the cycles increase, the likelihood that a stray piece of the virus has clinical meaning shrinks to zero. This is probably why asymptomatic people aren't contagious.
_____________________________________________________________________________ tp
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen